Gary J. Aguirre is an American lawyer, former investigator of the US Securities and Securities Commission (SEC) and whistleblower.
After working in a law firm briefly, he became a public defender, then worked as a lawyer in California. After achieving his professional and financial goals, he took a long break in 1995. In 2000, he decided to go into public service and return to law school, focusing on international law and securities.
After earning a second law degree, he applied for a job with the SEC, where he became the principal investigator on an insider trading case involving Pequot Capital Management. Suspicious of leaked information coming from John J. Mack, a Wall Street titan and major contributor to President George W. Bush's 2004 campaign, Aguirre wanted to summon Mack, but the supervisors said that Mack was too much "political influence" and would not be pursued. Aguirre complained to the superior about the preferential treatment given to Mack and was dismissed without warning. The Senate investigation later found out that his dismissal was illegal retaliation.
In May 2010, Pequot Capital resolved a $ 28 million insider trading allegation with the SEC and a month later, the SEC settled a $ 755,000 fraud suspension suit filed by Aguirre. Aguirre returned to private practice in San Diego in 2008, specializing in securities laws. He has emerged as the main critic of the SEC, calling it an established agency to protect the public from Wall Street, but now protecting Wall Street from the public. He represents Darcy Flynn, also a SEC whistleblower, who in the summer of 2011 was interviewed by staff of three congressional committees. He said that the SEC had destroyed thousands of initial investigative records and that SEC investigators seeking to pursue the case against Deutsche Bank were thwarted by Richard H. Walker, then the SEC's enforcement director, who shortly afterwards, took a job at Deutsche Bank as general counsel. He also represented Rodolfo Michelon, a fact-teller, a former financial inspector at Sempra Global, who claimed Sempra paid bribes to Mexican government officials and had filed a lawsuit against the SEC accusing the SEC of "diverting" its investigation of Sempra to a law firm linked to Sempra , essentially undermining the law.
Video Gary J. Aguirre
Entering private practice
Aguirre is a lawyer in San Diego, California. He was accepted at the State Bar of California on December 23, 1966. He became an associate in Brobeck, Phleger & amp; Harrison, then one of the largest companies in San Francisco. In his spare time, working on the presidential campaign of Robert F. Kennedy. On May 28, 1968, Kennedy sent him a letter speaking about the special role that lawyers play in bringing regular change to the country. Just eight days after sending the letter, Kennedy was murdered.
After a year, Aguirre left Brobeck to become a public defender in Fresno County, where he found the experimental experience and public service he sought. Then moving back to private practice in San Diego, he made a name for himself by proving that Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) was responsible for an air crash in San Diego in 1978, then the worst flight disaster in US history. In the 1980s, Aguirre pioneered construction defect litigation, the branch of classroom action law that was previously considered by San Diego lawyers to be too difficult for the plaintiff to win. In 1983, San Diego Magazine called him a "legal fire ball" for his case which proved the responsibility of the PSA and for his case against the Manville Corporation, which had a national interest.
Arguing on behalf of the owner of the house in handicapped construction cases, in 1994, Aguirre and his colleagues have won 94 consecutive cases, recovering more than $ 200 million for plaintiffs. Aguirre has received three awards "Extraordinary Trial Attorneys" from the San Diego Trial Lawyers Association.
Manville
In the early 1970s, Manville Corporation, the Dow Jones company sold products like cement for use on exterior walls. In a short time, the product was found damaged and deteriorated rapidly, causing significant damage to homes and buildings. Manville pulled products from the market in 1974, just four years after its introduction.
In the process of preparing his case, Aguirre began monitoring Manville in October 1981, when the company reorganized 75% of its assets to four of the five new companies it created. The board of directors and officers remain in the same position, so nothing changes; unless the assets are transferred. Aguirre becomes convinced Manville is trying to put his assets beyond the reach of unsecured lenders and when he goes to court, he estimates accurately the company will file between 45 and 60 days.
The three-month trial ended with Aguirre winning a $ 6 million award against Manville, at the time, the largest number in the history of San Diego Superior Court. The amount then increases to $ 7.5 million when delay damage is added. On July 2, 1982, a day after winning his lawsuit against Manville, Aguirre returned to court to ask Manville to be asked to post a $ 9 million bond to guarantee his client's assessment in a bankruptcy filing case, arguing that Manville was on the verge of filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Agree with Aguirre's argument, the judge ordered Manville to send the bond.
Eight weeks later, on August 26, 1982, Manville filed for Chapter 11 protection from several damage awards, shocking financial analysts. Unlike more than 12,000 other plaintiffs, particularly the asbestos case, Aguirre's client ratings are insured by $ 9 million worth of bonds. All lawsuits against Manville were soon postponed, but a federal bankruptcy judge in New York separated Aguirre's case from the others, paving the way for Aguirre's clients to receive their payments. Thousands of other lawsuits remain frozen until May 1988.
Maps Gary J. Aguirre
SEC investigator, into whistleblower
In July 2004, Aguirre entered public service as a senior adviser in the SEC Division of Enforcement in Washington, DC The routine inspection of Wall Street trade marked the heavily purchasing of heavy shares by Pequot Capital Management, a hedge fund, at Heller Financial in July 2001, purchased by GE Capital shortly thereafter, earns Pequot $ 18 million in a month. Aguirre was made the principal investigator in this case.
First of all, the profit is $ 18 million in a month and is handled entirely by hedge fund CEO [Arthur Samberg] without cooperation by others. In fact, their internal rules about how you should make this kind of decision - talking to others, visiting the company - none of these things are done. No e-mail, no reports, no research, no contact with the company, no contact with a third party. No, nothing. One day this guy [Samberg] just said, 'Heller Financial!'
As said in the Senate report, Samberg orders sometimes to stock twice as much as those sold that day. So if you sell 200,000 shares that day, he wants to buy 400,000. Well, how can you buy all this if you have never done any research, you have not talked to these people, you do not follow the stock? There is no rational explanation as to why this person bought more stock than anyone else in the country for 30 days. So then we started backing down - who did she talk to before buying that could know about this stock? Well, of course, there's only one person, and that's John Mack.
- Gary J. Aguirre, San Diego Magazine
Aguirre encouraged to summon John Mack, the top Wall Street executive whom Morgan Stanley was considering to become CEO of and became the main contributor to President George W. Bush's 2004 campaign. Initially, Aguirre received full support from other SEC staff and his superiors. This changed on June 23, 2005, when Aguirre received a phone call from Eric Dinallo, chief regulatory compliance at Morgan Stanley, who wanted to know if the SEC "will continue against Mack" due to concerns surrounding Morgan Stanley's decision to hire Mack as CEO. On the same day, Aguirre's supervisor, Robert Hanson, told him that it would be a tough struggle to pursue Mack because of Mack's "strong political connection."
Investigation slips
Just three days after the call to Aguirre, Mary Jo White made a call to Linda Chatman Thomsen. Thomsen was then Director of SEC Enforcement and Aguirre's boss four levels above him. White is a partner in Debevoise & amp; Plimpton, the law firm hired by Morgan Stanley to pick up Mack and take responsibility for the process. He was previously the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York who has jurisdiction over Wall Street. Although Thomsen told the Senate, he told White that he could not say anything about Mack's investigation, the Senate report said White's points of conversation indicated that Thomsen said there was "smoke" but "definitely no fire".
Over the next two days, Aguirre sent his supervisor an analysis of the evidence against Pequot and suggested interviewing Mack. On June 28, he conducted a "heated discussion" with Mark Kreitman, one of his supervisors and former professors in Georgetown, for the SEC's refusal to interview Mack. Meanwhile, he was given an end-of-year performance evaluation, which noted his dedication. Hanson writes, "[Aguirre] has consistently tried hard, and then some," and a two-step salary increase is approved.
A month later, on July 27, 2005, Aguirre sent an e-mail to his superior Paul R. Berger, explaining the importance of phone calls and expressed concern that "Mack treatment differently is inconsistent with the Commission's mission, which is" to protect investors, which is fair, orderly and efficient, and facilitates the formation of capital. "In this e-mail, Aguirre also reports to Berger that Hanson has said Mack has a" political connection ".
Retaliation
Despite a pay raise and praised for his work on the Pequot case, after Aguirre voiced concern about the special treatment given to Mack, Berger told Hanson to perform an "additional evaluation" of Aguirre and one other staff attorney "looking for trouble". The Senate report noted that such re-evaluation is not an official part of the SEC's evaluation process, nor is the SEC official able to recall another example where "additional evaluation" is designed for other employees. Aguirre continues to have a conversation with Hanson about Mack in early August. Hanson continued to refer to Mack's political connections and on August 4, 2005 wrote, "Mack's advice will have the 'juice' as I explained last night - which means that they can contact Paul and Linda (and probably others)." Apparently setting a precedent, Aguirre's supervisor reevaluated his work performance, reversing the positive judgment given just a month earlier. While on vacation, Aguirre was abruptly dismissed without warning on September 1, 2005. His termination was later found to be unlawful by subsequent Senate investigations and reports.
Berger stopped Mack's investigation and sealed the case against Pequot without filing any charges. A few months earlier, on January 31, 2005, Berger had received an e-mail from Jan Lower, another lawyer, who explained in detail the potential income of $ 2 million that SEC officials could obtain at Debevoise. On September 8, 2005, just days after Aguirre was dismissed, a SEC official on the same staff level as Berger wrote him a e-mail called "Debevoise", said he had mentioned Berger's "interest" to White and within weeks, Berger will leave the SEC to join Debevoise & amp; Plimpton as partner. Berger submitted his resignation to the SEC on 15 May 2006 and on 1 June 2006 became partner at Debevoise & amp; Plimpton, where he continues to work. White refused to ask the SEC to close the investigation.
Vindication by the Senate
Aguirre wrote an 18-page letter to members of the US Senate who are the heads of various related committees and subcommittees, detailing his allegations about Pequot. Senators Charles E. Grassley and Richard C. Shelby, both Republicans, asked SEC officials to provide a confidential explanation of the matter. Aguirre accused the SEC of failing to pursue Mack because of his political connections as a major fundraiser for George W. Bush. In 2006, both the Senate Finance Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee were investigating the issue, culminating in a Forbes magazine called "spicy" report. In testimony, Aguirre told the committee there needs to be better hedge fund rules to protect the public. He said, "There is growing evidence that unregulated hedge funds today have improved and improved the practice of manipulation and fraud among other market participants.Hot potential hedge funds may impact other market participants with no real limits." He warned that fixing the SEC so that it would protect investors and capital markets would not be easy because the strong Wall Street investment banks liked things like them. He said the SEC and the Department of Justice had failed to prosecute violations by hedge funds, and he compared the situation preceded the stock market crash of 1929.
In the Senate's oversight role, he conducted extensive investigations into whether Mack received unlawful privileges from the SEC and whether Aguirre was unlawfully dismissed as a result of objections to this treatment. The Senate reviewed 10,000 pages of documents and held more than 30 witness interviews. In addition, there were three hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee in June, September and December 2006. The combined report was officially released on August 3, 2007. The Senate found Aguirre has been honored until he questioned the SEC's fault with Mack, that Mack was treated privileged and that Aguirre was illegally fired in retaliation.
Court verification and completion
Aguirre then sued the SEC under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) looking for documents related to his work and his return, as well as SEC investigations against Pequot and Mack. The SEC, claiming some exceptions under the law released a version of the edited document, thus hiding the information. They also failed to produce the original personnel file of Aguirre. Aguirre is suspected in his demands that the SEC has failed to perform an adequate document search and he challenged the SEC's failure to produce its original personnel file, containing missing records of the version given to him. On April 28, 2008, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia cited the Senate report extensively, deciding to support it, forcing the SEC to submit documents to Aguirre. The Court wrote of "the importance of understanding disputes between the parties, as well as the plaintiff's legal argument that the public interest in disclosure of the excised record exceeds the interests of privacy" under the exceptions claimed by the SEC and relies heavily on the Senate report. He notes how the SEC refused to fire Mack and did not consider it a potential tipper until after a front-page article in the New York Times revealed a failed investigation and then did not overthrow it until the law on limiting civil and criminal penalties was exhausted.
In 2007, Senators Chuck Grassley and Arlen Specter urged the SEC to reopen the case against Pequot, but remained closed. Making extensive use of documents issued by the SEC for him, Aguirre found incriminating evidence proving that Pequot had engaged in insider trading at Microsoft and he shared this evidence with the SEC in a 16-page letter to SEC chairman Christopher Cox, dated January 2, 2009. In a few days, the SEC reopened the investigation, but no charges were filed in the next few weeks or months, although when it finally filed a lawsuit, they closely followed the evidence stated in Aguirre's letter.
On April 1, 2009, Aguirre filed a second lawsuit against the SEC for unlawful disclosure of his record under the Privacy Act of 1974, for violating the Fifth due clause of the amendment and for damages under the Privacy Act and FOIA. On December 2, 2009, in a provisional decision on the Aguirre FOIA case, the Court again decided to support it. On May 26, 2010, Aguirre filed a paper in this case, seeking an order that directed the SEC to release additional Pequot notes to him on the grounds that under the FOIA, the SEC must submit the note to him for not filing a case against Pequot or anyone else. The next morning, on 27 May 2010, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Pequot, Samberg and Zilkha and announced the settlement with Pequot.
A month later, the SEC agreed to pay Aguirre $ 755,000, an amount equal to four years and ten months of lost salary and attorney's fees. This amount appears to be the largest settlement ever expressed by the Merit System Protection Council. Upon completion of the settlement with the SEC for the cessation of his mistake, Aguirre said, "Too bad the team that worked with me in the SEC did not complete the Pequot investigation.The filing of this case in 2005 or 2006, before the financial crisis, would be the right message at the right time to the Wall Street elite: the SEC is chasing the big fish too. "
Back to private practice
Aguirre now specializes in securities law, defending those who are victims of investor fraud and those who want to advance to expose the offense. In 2008, he returned to San Diego with a reputation winning case.
He continues to work on pequot insider trading investigations, collect and gather evidence, obtain information through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. In April 2008, he obtained a court order that forced the SEC to give him a key record of an investigation that Pequot later closed and later that year found the evidence necessary to prove alleged insider trading against Pequot, founder Arthur Samberg and his former employee David Zilkha On January 2, 2009, Aguirre sent a 16 page letter with evidence to Christopher Cox, then chairman of the SEC. In it, he argues that there is sufficient evidence to reopen the case and he recommends that the US Department of Justice open investigations against Pequot, Samberg and Zilkha for possible interference of witnesses, bribery, justice barriers, and Corrupt Organizations Act's violations. As the SEC continued to work, on May 26, 2010, Aguirre sought an order directing the SEC to release additional Pequot records to him. He argues that because the SEC has failed to file charges against Pequot or anyone else, under the FOIA, the SEC must submit the records. The next morning, on May 27, 2010, using accusations that closely followed January Aguirre's letter, the SEC filed suit against Pequot, Samberg and Zilkha.
Aguirre helps the staff of Senator Grassley examine the 21,000 Federal Reserve transactions (the Fed) involving taxpayers' funds that are distributed to banks and other financial institutions. The Fed is forced to disclose information by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Bloomberg News and Fox News, as well as the provisions contained in the Wall Street reform legislation. Despite statements by the Fed about transparency, the information released is incomplete. Lack of details makes it impossible to know how much profit the recipient receives and only the name of the recipient and the amount of funds known. Aguirre said that between $ 3 and $ 4 trillion in cash transfers are made and $ 9 to $ 11 trillion in commitments that taxpayer funds will cover the cost of failed investments. "It looks like they borrowed money from the Fed, say, at 70 cents and sell it back to the Fed for 90 cents.we can not be sure for sure because the Fed will not tell us.The Fed publishes the information but it's not enough for you to find out what's going on, "Aguirre said.
Aguirre represents Darcy Flynn, a SEC lawyer who also became a secret person after Robert Khuzami asked his staff via e-mail on May 18, 2011 to report any questionable behavior on behalf of lawyers representing clients. Although Khuzami means a lawyer outside the SEC, Flynn reports on activities occurring within the SEC. At the beginning of Flynn's 13-year career at the SEC, he worked on a case in which investigators thought they had clear evidence of fraud against Deutsche Bank. In an interview with Der Spiegel, CEO Rolf Breuer has denied the bank was involved in talks to acquire Bankers Trust, causing Bankers Trust shares to fall, which could lower the cost of merging. SEC researchers began to find out the problem, collect testimony and oath documents that prove Breuer has lied. Deutsche Bank hired former SEC law enforcement director Gary Lynch to persuade the SEC not to continue the case, which had to be approved by the boss before proceeding. Approval to move forward with the case was approved by every level and only had the signature of Richard H. Walker, then served as SEC enforcement director. Instead of approving the case, on July 10, 2001 he resigned. On July 23, 2001, a letter was sent to Deutsche Bank to notify them, "" The investigation into the above matters has been stopped. "SEC stopped the fraud investigation without any explanation of customs regarding its decision to close the case.1 Walkers was hired as a general counsel by Deutsche Bank In 2004, he hired Khuzami to work at the bank and a few years later, recommended him to become SEC enforcement director Flynn was interviewed by staff of three congressional committees in the summer of 2011 on Deutsche Bank case and file destruction of thousands of preliminary investigation cases conducted by SEC Senator Grassley wrote a letter to the SEC regarding the destruction of documents and inspectors General SEC H. David Kotz investigated the matter.
Predict the financial collapse of 2008
In 2006, while testifying before Senator Arlen Specter and the Senate Judiciary Committee on Mack, Pequot Capital, and lack of SEC supervision, he warned that the SEC's enforcement was very weak. He said that the SEC has regained only $ 110,000 from insider trading hedge funds for one year when the Committee itself has found evidence that over a period of one year, more than 41% of all mergers and acquisitions of more than a billion dollars involved insider trading. Aguirre warned that the lack of effective oversight of rampant corruption caused Wall Street to experience unlawful abuses and market levers that led to the 1929 Wall Street crash. In 2008, he delivered a similar message at the Sibos conference in Vienna. Just before the collapse of Bear Stearns, he wrote a letter to the Senate Banking Committee that state banks, and especially Bear Stearns, were at risk because of subprime debt exposure and credit default swaps. In September 2008, during the debate on the Troubled Assets Assistance Program (TARP), Aguirre's projection of the cost of the taxpayer's bailout was quoted on the floor of the US House of Representatives.
Continuing criticism
Aguirre is often quoted and interviewed in the media on matters relating to financial and securities law and the complainant. Aguirre says the SEC is completely losing its vision and that the mentality and culture will not change until the agency is no longer "run by a lawyer on leave" from Wall Street.
On July 22, 2010, President Barack Obama signed Wall Street reform legislation, Wall Street Dodd-Frank Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which included provisions to free the SEC from FOIA requests by the public. Aguirre uses the FOIA's request to get a record relating to why his SEC superiors have stymied Pequot's investigation, a charge that prompted two US Senate committees to investigate. The documents, released against the wishes of the SEC, led to the discovery of evidence that resulted in a major settlement. Aguirre was the first to talk about exceptions and letters by Congressman Darrell Issa to Mary Schapiro, the SEC chief relying heavily on his article, "The Dodd-Frank Act: FOIA FoIA Release for SEC Errors?" from Wall Street attorney . The congressional testimony by the Project on Government Oversight at the hearing on the legislative proposal to address the issue refers to Aguirre's case as an example of a critical need for public scrutiny of government agencies. Aguirre said the new bill would block public access to SEC records and impede oversight. Other critics refer to the bill as a "backroom deal" between the SEC and the US Congress to cover up the SEC's failure.
The following week, the first Senate and then the House unanimously issued money to revoke the exception. Obama signed the bill to cancel the release on October 5, 2010.
Aguirre describes the SEC as an agent created to protect the public from Wall Street, but now protects Wall Street from the public, calling it a revolving door, where people move from SEC positions to very profitable positions on Wall Street as well as upside down. "All agencies are to some extent or another turnstile [where government employees move to the private sector and earn more money], but in the SEC, which you turn is a big salary jump, the SEC Manager can make $ 200,000. can earn $ 2 million as an initial salary outside and can go up from there.Now, when he leaves I'm not sure he's worth $ 2 million as a lawyer, but he brings Rolodex with him and that Rolodex is Gold, This system defends itself, because those who still know their turn will come if they play the game. They see an associate director or director move to a $ 2 million job with Wall Street law firm.Later, the employee is called back to his former colleague and says, 'You know I'm right do not think there are many cases against this person, i want you to see it. ' And the case is gone, the system goes on and on. "Two watchdogs Aguirre left the SEC for a profitable position at a private law firm. Paul Berger works at Debevoise and Plimpton. After failing to investigate Bernon Madoff's poncho scheme, Linda Chatman Thomsen abandoned his position as SEC Enforcement Director to partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell, where according to Wall Street Journal , he will be part of his "white-collar defense" group. Robert Khuzami, who succeeded him, worked as a prosecutor at the US Attorney's office in Manhattan, Southern District of New York, then went to Deutsche Bank for several years before re-named the Director of Enforcement SEC.
The SEC's handling of the $ 18 million Pequot earnings investigation at Heller Financial, in sharp contrast to their aggressive efforts against low-level GE employees and a kung fu instructor who made much less trades on Heller, earned more than $ 150,000. According to Aguirre, the decision to pursue small cases and ignore the much larger ones involving the financial elite is less an exception, than the rules and explains why Bernie Madoff is neglected for so long.
In April 2012, representing Rodolfo Michelson's whistleblower, Aguirre filed a FOIA claim against the SEC in connection with Michelson's claim that Sempra Global bribed Mexican government officials to advance its projects. Michelon filed a lawsuit against the SEC after the SEC's investigation of bribery concluded that the allegations had been addressed. The lawsuit alleges that the SEC "diverted" its investigations into law firms linked to Sempra and searched for SEC records showing how the SEC conducted an investigation. Baker & amp; McKenzie and Jones Day investigated the allegations of bribery. Sempra's executive vice president and previous general counsel were partners at Jones Day. Aguirre said, "The idea that there are corporate classes, Fortune 500 Companies and Wall Street banks and Wall Street in general who are able to conduct their own investigations through favorite law firms is disgusting for the host of rules that require the SEC to be neutral, unbiased and treat everyone is the same. "
Education
Aguirre received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of California, Berkeley in 1962, and a law degree from Boalt Hall in 1966, where he was a grantee of the Ford Foundation.
During a trip to Russia in 1987, Aguirre met with several filmmakers at the Moscow Film Festival and found interest in the film. Upon reaching his professional and financial goals, Aguirre abandoned his legal practice in 1995. He returned to college, earning his Master of Fine Arts in film from UCLA.
While living in Spain in 2000, he became transfixed by the Bush case v. Gore and start thinking about the letter he received from Robert F. Kennedy, whom he kept because it inspired him. Re-read the letter, he re-inspired, reminding that lawyers can have a role outside cases of construction defects.
At the age of 61, Aguirre returned to law school at Georgetown University Law Center to study international law and securities. Aguirre received a Master of Laws degree with a distinction (honors) in 2003 and in January 2004, his LL.M thesis won second place at the Securities and Exchange Commission Association Alumni Annual Securities Law Writing Competition and published in Delaware. Journal of Corporate Law . Four of his professors are on SEC staff, including one, Mark Kreitman, who later became his boss at the SEC. Kreitman described Aguirre as "the best student he ever had". After graduation, he wanted to enter the public service and an adviser suggested that he apply for a fraud investigator's job already available in the SEC.
Personal
Son Aguirre is a musician, Gary Jules; his younger brother, Michael, was a San Diego city lawyer from 2004 to 2008.
Preferred publication
- "Enron Decree: Closing the Fraud-Free Zone at the Errant Gatekeeper?" (PDF) Delaware Journal of Corporate Law , Vol. 28, No. 2 (2003)
- "Part 10 (b) Hatches New Theory of Securities Fraud, But Will Fly?" (PDF) California Consumer Lawyer Forum (January/February 2004)
- "The Dodd-Frank Act: FOIA exemption for SEC errors?" (PDF) Wall Street Attorney , Vol. 14, Issue 9 (September 2010)
- "Madoff Miss Fits SECED Set Pattern With Pequot" Bloomberg News (February 4, 2009). Retrieved 18 February 2011
See also
- Whistleblower list
- Capture order
- Mark Pittman - predicts the collapse of the banking system in 2008 and filed a FOIA lawsuit against the Federal Reserve Inside Job - an Academy Award winning documentary about "systemic corruption in the United States by the financial services industry... and the consequences of systemic corruption"
- Asset Backed Securities Lending Facility - Federal Reserve Program
Footnote
References
External links
- Legal Law Official Website of Aguirre. Retrieved 21 February 2011
- 16-page Aguirre's "smoking gun" letter to the chairman of SEC Cox, January 2, 2009 (PDF) Government Accountability Project. Retrieved 21 February 2011
- Aguirre on what constitutes an insider trading in the Bloomberg Television News segment (December 16, 2010). Retrieved February 26, 2011
- Reporter Matt Taibbi talks about Gary Aguirre Democracy Now! Videos and transcripts. (February 22, 2011). Discussions about Aguirre and John Mack begin around 4:58 pm. Retrieved on March 4, 2011
- "Wall Street Impunity", interview with Gary Aguirre Radio Nederland Wereldomroep. Our Country In (March 12, 2011). Retrieved on March 16, 2011
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments